Taskcato guides
An AI research workflow you can actually use
Research is more than collecting links. A useful brief needs a defined question, credible evidence, a structure that supports a decision, and an honest account of what is still unknown.
Start with a precise request
Try: “Research three ways a small neighborhood bakery could reduce food waste this quarter. Focus on practical options, include source links for any numbers, separate costs from assumptions, and draft a one-page recommendation for the owner.” This is an example prompt, not a precomputed result or a guarantee of specific sources.
Giving the audience and decision up front makes it easier to distinguish actionable evidence from interesting background. Set a geographic scope and timeframe if the question depends on local rules or current prices.
Where the specialists fit
Cato can ask Scout to investigate a topic, Strategist to organize options, and Scribe to draft the brief. It chooses whether delegation makes sense for the request; the exact path can vary. You can then ask a follow-up question in the same conversation, such as which claims need stronger evidence.
A good final draft states the question, gives a short comparison, links to supporting sources where available, and identifies open questions. Do not assume that a cited page supports every sentence around it: open sources and check the key claims yourself.
- Check publication dates and whether sources are primary.
- Separate estimates from confirmed prices and regulations.
- Ask for a revision if the brief misses a constraint or audience.
When not to delegate research
If you already have a source and need one simple fact, use a direct lookup. If a decision depends on licensed advice or confidential facts, consult the appropriate professional and avoid sharing information you are not authorized to provide. For a custom, automated research pipeline inside your own application, developer tooling may be more appropriate than a chat product.